Editorial Policy
Our commitment to accuracy, transparency, and quality in all educational content.
Content Review Process
All instructional content on DictaLearn undergoes a systematic review process to ensure accuracy, clarity, and alignment with established learning principles.
Review Cadence
- •Initial Review: All new content is reviewed before publication
- •Periodic Updates: Core methodology and instructional pages are reviewed every 6 months
- •Ad-hoc Updates: Content is updated immediately when errors are identified or new research emerges
- •User Feedback: Community reports are reviewed within 48 hours
Review Criteria
Each content piece is evaluated against the following standards:
- •Factual Accuracy: Claims are verified against primary sources and peer-reviewed research
- •Source Quality: Citations reference reputable academic journals, industry standards, or official documentation
- •Clarity: Technical concepts are explained in accessible language without sacrificing accuracy
- •Completeness: Content addresses the topic comprehensively and acknowledges limitations
- •Transparency: Methodology, assumptions, and constraints are clearly stated
Source Standards
We prioritize high-quality, verifiable sources for all educational claims and methodology decisions.
Preferred Sources
- •Peer-reviewed academic journals in linguistics, education, and cognitive science
- •Official technical documentation from speech recognition providers (MDN, OpenAI, etc.)
- •Industry-standard references (IEEE, ACM publications)
- •Established educational research databases (Google Scholar, ERIC)
Citation Requirements
- •All research claims include inline citations with author, year, and DOI when available
- •Technical specifications reference official documentation with direct links
- •Full bibliography provided on methodology and research-heavy pages
Authorship & Anonymity
DictaLearn is developed and maintained by an independent software developer with expertise in educational technology and web application development.
Why Anonymity?
The creator chooses to remain anonymous to focus attention on the quality of the platform and methodology rather than personal credentials. This approach emphasizes:
- •Evidence-based design: Features are validated by research citations, not personal authority
- •Transparent methodology: All learning principles and technical decisions are documented with sources
- •User outcomes: Platform effectiveness is measured by user progress data, not creator credentials
Content Attribution
All content is authored by DictaLearn (the organization) and reviewed by the development team. When external expertise is consulted, it is explicitly credited in the content.
Corrections & Updates
We are committed to maintaining accuracy and correcting errors promptly.
Error Reporting
If you identify an error, outdated information, or have questions about our content:
- •Email us at dictalearn@gmail.com with specific details
- •Include the page URL and a description of the issue
- •We review all reports within 48 hours and update content as needed
Update Transparency
- •All pages display a "Last reviewed" date
- •Significant corrections are noted in the content when appropriate
- •Methodology changes are documented and explained
Conflicts of Interest
DictaLearn is an independent platform with no external funding, sponsorships, or partnerships that influence content decisions.
Independence Statement
- •No paid endorsements or sponsored content
- •Technology choices are based on technical merit and cost-effectiveness
- •Research citations are selected based on quality and relevance, not affiliation
- •Revenue comes solely from user subscriptions
Related Pages
Questions or Feedback?
We welcome questions, corrections, and suggestions about our content and editorial process.
Contact Us